View In:
ArcGIS JavaScript
ArcGIS Online Map Viewer
ArcGIS Earth
ArcGIS Pro
Service Description: The basis for using this map was KNICK, S. T., AND J. W. CONNELLY. 2010. Greater sage-grouse: ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. Studies in Avian Biology 38. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA and KNICK, S.T., S.E. HANSER and K.L. PRESTON. 2013. Modeling ecological minimum requirements for distribution of greater sage-grouse leks: implications for population connectivity across their western range, U.S.A. Ecology and Evolution. 3(6) 1539-1561. These data can be reclassified into the 3 classes of sagebrush deemed relevant for sage-grouse, 0-25% sagebrush landscape cover (Value =1) where persistence of leks is less likely, 25-65% sagebrush landscape cover (value =2) where persistence of leks has a positive relationship to more sagebrush cover (between 25 and 65%) and > 65% (value =3) where sage grouse persistence is most likely. Reclassed areas of just sagebrush (1) and no sagebrush (0, areas with originally no sagebrush or recently burned areas). Landfire codes were: 2080, 2125, 2126, 2220, 2064, 2072, 2079, 2124) This layer is an intermediate layer used to create a sagebrush landscape cover layer using a moving window analysis. See Landfire metadata for an assessment of that data. See WFDSS, GEOMAC and MTBS fire metadata for more information on those data.
Map Name: Layers
Legend
All Layers and Tables
Dynamic Legend
Dynamic All Layers
Layers:
Description: The basis for using this map was KNICK, S. T., AND J. W. CONNELLY. 2010. Greater sage-grouse: ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. Studies in Avian Biology 38. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA and KNICK, S.T., S.E. HANSER and K.L. PRESTON. 2013. Modeling ecological minimum requirements for distribution of greater sage-grouse leks: implications for population connectivity across their western range, U.S.A. Ecology and Evolution. 3(6) 1539-1561. These data can be reclassified into the 3 classes of sagebrush deemed relevant for sage-grouse, 0-25% sagebrush landscape cover (Value =1) where persistence of leks is less likely, 25-65% sagebrush landscape cover (value =2) where persistence of leks has a positive relationship to more sagebrush cover (between 25 and 65%) and > 65% (value =3) where sage grouse persistence is most likely. Reclassed areas of just sagebrush (1) and no sagebrush (0, areas with originally no sagebrush or recently burned areas). Landfire codes were: 2080, 2125, 2126, 2220, 2064, 2072, 2079, 2124) This layer is an intermediate layer used to create a sagebrush landscape cover layer using a moving window analysis. See Landfire metadata for an assessment of that data. See WFDSS, GEOMAC and MTBS fire metadata for more information on those data.
Copyright Text: Amarina Wuenschel, Steve Hanser
Spatial Reference:
102100
(3857)
LatestVCSWkid(0)
Single Fused Map Cache: false
Initial Extent:
XMin: -1.3998451203504087E7
YMin: 3168875.059676528
XMax: -1.0740100936803551E7
YMax: 6968058.0550712105
Spatial Reference: 102100
(3857)
LatestVCSWkid(0)
Full Extent:
XMin: -1.424905787888859E7
YMin: 3825718.417488209
XMax: -1.103326787888859E7
YMax: 6732538.417488209
Spatial Reference: 102100
(3857)
LatestVCSWkid(0)
Units: esriMeters
Supported Image Format Types: PNG32,PNG24,PNG,JPG,DIB,TIFF,EMF,PS,PDF,GIF,SVG,SVGZ,BMP
Document Info:
Title: Sagebrush MW5k Percent
Author:
Comments: The basis for using this map was KNICK, S. T., AND J. W. CONNELLY. 2010. Greater sage-grouse: ecology and conservation of a landscape species and its habitats. Studies in Avian Biology 38. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA and KNICK, S.T., S.E. HANSER and K.L. PRESTON. 2013. Modeling ecological minimum requirements for distribution of greater sage-grouse leks: implications for population connectivity across their western range, U.S.A. Ecology and Evolution. 3(6) 1539-1561. These data can be reclassified into the 3 classes of sagebrush deemed relevant for sage-grouse, 0-25% sagebrush landscape cover (Value =1) where persistence of leks is less likely, 25-65% sagebrush landscape cover (value =2) where persistence of leks has a positive relationship to more sagebrush cover (between 25 and 65%) and > 65% (value =3) where sage grouse persistence is most likely. Reclassed areas of just sagebrush (1) and no sagebrush (0, areas with originally no sagebrush or recently burned areas). Landfire codes were: 2080, 2125, 2126, 2220, 2064, 2072, 2079, 2124) This layer is an intermediate layer used to create a sagebrush landscape cover layer using a moving window analysis. See Landfire metadata for an assessment of that data. See WFDSS, GEOMAC and MTBS fire metadata for more information on those data.
Subject: Map was created to evaluate fire and invasive priority landscapes within greater sage-grouse habitat.
Category:
Keywords: Landfire
AntialiasingMode: Fast
TextAntialiasingMode: Force
Supports Dynamic Layers: true
MaxRecordCount: 2000
MaxSelectionCount: 2000
MaxImageHeight: 4096
MaxImageWidth: 4096
Supported Query Formats: JSON, geoJSON, PBF
Supports Query Data Elements: true
Min Scale: 0
Max Scale: 0
Supports Datum Transformation: true
Child Resources:
Info
Dynamic Layer
Supported Operations:
Export Map
Identify
QueryLegends
QueryDomains
Find
Return Updates
Generate KML